By: Arjit Mishra
A theoretical physicist named Sankar Das Sarma has put up some thoughts under a column published by New Scientist. He says whatever we have came across in physics till now are merely working descriptions, and nothing but mathematical equations that matches with parts of nature known to us, there are enough stuff left which is potent enough to create a upheaval in our basics. He explains that physics is better understandable as we don't treat the laws of physics as absolutes. Sarma says it's better to view laws of physics as if they are layers of an onion. As we learn more about the physics of our universe, we are peeling off more and more layers but there is always enough to peel. So if something unusual is appearing we have to look both aspects whether our existing laws are being broke or the appeared result is an outcome of a misinterpretation, existing physical laws aren't robust enough.
"We might be living in a simulation"
